
Mmmm, nothing rounds off a two week holiday like a corrupted 1.5TB external hard drive and the simultaneous death of your PS3 hard drive. 72 hours and some expenditure after these sad events, most data has been or is being recovered. Thankfully a lot of it had been backed up recently and a large chunk of the remainder is being recovered at the moment by a heaven-sent program called 'uneraser' but you know what they say - these things come in threes. Hmm, makes you wonder what's coming next in terms of data corruption. Umm, now what was I on about?
Now I can't say these two things haven't taken a pounding over their lifetime, and I can't say they always got turned off in accordance with the tedious 'eject your drive/ turn off your system safely' processes. Still, if these things are made to be used on a daily basis by children or people who don't work in IT, shouldn't they be a *bit* more robust? They are, fundamentally, consumer goods which are made to be used for a few years before going wallop. And in both cases, unless you are relatively IT literate, you wouldn't necessarily know what was what the problem was. The lack of substantive guidance or built-in data protection systems just seems poor to me. Who the hell wants to set up a RAID array or endure the tedium of regular back-ups every weekend?
It just seems like the people who make these things have shoved responsibility for flakey and fragile technology onto people who don't live eat or sleep platters, clusters and allocation tables. And I think that's poor. I am cheered by the fact that the nerds who make this stuff will have to deal with this though. This is because if you want us all to shell out for downloading HD material, we're going to need weapons-grade hard drives for Granny Lumpkin to watch Coronation Street on.


